Indigenous Empowerment through Collective Learning

Autor/in	Enn, Rosa
Titel	Indigenous Empowerment through Collective Learning
Quelle	In: Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6 (2012) 3, S.149-161 (13 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1750-497X
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Qualitative Research; Content Analysis; Student Empowerment; Indigenous Populations; Locus of Control; Decision Making; Justice; Storage; Nuclear Energy; Hazardous Materials; Civil Rights; Conservation (Environment); Political Power; Anthropology; Social Sciences; Quality of Life; Public Health; Community Action; Social Change; Educational Technology; Taiwan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Qualitative Forschung; Inhaltsanalyse; Studienberechtigung; Sinti und Roma; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Gerechtigkeit; Speicherung; Atomenergie; Kernenergie; Hazardous substance; Gefahrstoff; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; Conservation; Environment; Konservierung; Bewahung; Umwelt; Politische Macht; Anthropologie; Social science; Sozialwissenschaften; Gesellschaftswissenschaften; Lebensqualität; Gesundheitswesen; Sozialer Wandel; Unterrichtsmedien
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to an indigenous community that lives in the periphery of Taiwan. The Dao on Orchid Island have had to face serious abuse of their human rights in terms of ecological exploitation and environmental injustice. The article highlights the empowerment of the indigenous group through collective learning. In this process the importance of being represented at both local and international levels is emphasized. Despite the democratization and implemented mechanism to protect indigenous peoples' rights and dignity, the issue of self-determination and dependency on financial compensation still remains unsolved. Design/methodology/approach: Data are collected and elaborated primarily using recognized research methods that are common in social anthropology (Bernard). Field research was conducted in 2007, 2008, and 2011 in Taiwan. A variety of interviews and formal and informal conversations formed the basis of data collection. According to qualitative content analysis, concepts and procedures developed by Glaser and Laudel, Bernard, as well as Schmidt were applied. Findings: The outcomes of the research highlight the need to investigate the dynamic between modern technologies and the fight of vulnerable minorities in multicultural and democratic countries. Collective learning, solidarity, and presence at national and international levels are essential to improve empowerment to gain justice and respect of human rights. Research limitations/implications: The indigenous Dao were excluded from decision making processes regarding the government's appropriation of land on Orchid Island to be used to store nuclear waste. The Dao gained power due to educational technologies within a local and global network. Although Taiwan promotes its cultural diversity nowadays, social and environmental justice is still a goal to reach. Originality/value: The paper provides valuable insights of an indigenous community in Taiwan and their struggles against environmental injustice and exploitation. Due to the fieldwork, a unique and authentic picture of the indigenous peoples' situation is offered. (Contains 2 figures and 12 notes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10