Not Quite Normal: Consequences of Violating the Assumption of Normality in Regression Mixture Models

Autor/inn/en	Van Horn, M. Lee; Smith, Jessalyn; Fagan, Abigail A.; Jaki, Thomas; Feaster, Daniel J.; Masyn, Katherine; Hawkins, J. David; Howe, George
Titel	Not Quite Normal: Consequences of Violating the Assumption of Normality in Regression Mixture Models
Quelle	In: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19 (2012) 2, S.227-249 (23 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1070-5511
DOI	10.1080/10705511.2012.659622
Schlagwörter	Structural Equation Models; Home Management; Drug Abuse; Research Methodology; Monte Carlo Methods; Simulation; Error Patterns; Norms; Regression (Statistics); Program Effectiveness + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Haushaltswesen; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Monte-Carlo-Methode; Simulation program; Simulationsprogramm; Fehlertyp; Normwert; Regression; Regressionsanalyse
Abstract	Regression mixture models, which have only recently begun to be used in applied research, are a new approach for finding differential effects. This approach comes at the cost of the assumption that error terms are normally distributed within classes. This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to explore the effects of relatively minor violations of this assumption. The use of an ordered polytomous outcome is then examined as an alternative that makes somewhat weaker assumptions, and finally both approaches are demonstrated with an applied example looking at differences in the effects of family management on the highly skewed outcome of drug use. Results show that violating the assumption of normal errors results in systematic bias in both latent class enumeration and parameter estimates. Additional classes that reflect violations of distributional assumptions are found. Under some conditions it is possible to come to conclusions that are consistent with the effects in the population, but when errors are skewed in both classes the results typically no longer reflect even the pattern of effects in the population. The polytomous regression model performs better under all scenarios examined and comes to reasonable results with the highly skewed outcome in the applied example. We recommend that careful evaluation of model sensitivity to distributional assumptions be the norm when conducting regression mixture models. (Contains 7 tables, 2 footnotes, and 4 figures.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Psychology Press. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10