Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | van Hooft, Edwin A. J.; Born, Marise Ph. |
---|---|
Titel | Intentional Response Distortion on Personality Tests: Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Response Processes when Faking |
Quelle | In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (2012) 2, S.301-316 (16 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0021-9010 |
DOI | 10.1037/a0025711 |
Schlagwörter | Job Applicants; Semantics; Eye Movements; Response Style (Tests); Personnel Selection; Metric System; Integrity; Personality; Personality Measures; Human Body; Higher Education; Feedback (Response); Identification; Ethics; Computer Assisted Testing |
Abstract | Intentional response distortion or faking among job applicants completing measures such as personality and integrity tests is a concern in personnel selection. The present study aimed to investigate whether eye-tracking technology can improve our understanding of the response process when faking. In an experimental within-participants design, a Big Five personality test and an integrity measure were administered to 129 university students in 2 conditions: a respond honestly and a faking good instruction. Item responses, response latencies, and eye movements were measured. Results demonstrated that all personality dimensions were fakeable. In support of the theoretical position that faking involves a less cognitively demanding process than responding honestly, we found that response times were on average 0.25 s slower and participants had less eye fixations in the fake good condition. However, in the fake good condition, participants had more fixations on the 2 extreme response options of the 5-point answering scale, and they fixated on these more directly after having read the question. These findings support the idea that faking leads to semantic rather than self-referenced item interpretations. Eye-tracking was demonstrated to be potentially useful in detecting faking behavior, improving detecting rates over and beyond response extremity and latency metrics. (Contains 5 tables and 4 figures.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |