A Mere Footnote? "An American Dilemma" and Supreme Court School Desegregation Jurisprudence

Autor/inn/en	Crawford, Jon G.; O'Neill, Linda J.
Titel	A Mere Footnote? "An American Dilemma" and Supreme Court School Desegregation Jurisprudence
Quelle	In: Peabody Journal of Education, 86 (2011) 5, S.506-528 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0161-956X
DOI	10.1080/0161956X.2011.616132
Schlagwörter	School Desegregation; Court Litigation; School Resegregation; Public Education; Federal Courts; Race; Social Science Research + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Integrative Schule; Rechtsstreit; Öffentliche Erziehung; Bundesgerichtshof; Rasse; Abstammung; Social scientific research; Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung
Abstract	This article provides historical and legal context for recent U.S. Supreme Court school desegregation decisions. The Supreme Court's race-based and race-neutral arguments from "Brown" (1954) to "Parents Involved" (2007) are examined within their broader context. Policy implications and potential support for diversity goal arguments given the Obama administration's appointments of Sonia Sotomayor and Elana Kagan as the 111th and 112th Supreme Court Justices are considered in light of enduring issues and guiding ideals delineated over half a century ago in Gunnar Myrdal's landmark study of race in the United States, "An American Dilemma." (Contains 11 footnotes.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10