Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Bell, Amani; Kelton, Jill; McDonagh, Nadia; Mladenovic, Rosina; Morrison, Kellie |
---|---|
Titel | A Critical Evaluation of the Usefulness of a Coding Scheme to Categorise Levels of Reflective Thinking |
Quelle | In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (2011) 7, S.797-815 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0260-2938 |
DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2010.488795 |
Schlagwörter | Reflection; Thinking Skills; Student Journals; Coding; Classification; Business Administration Education; Undergraduate Students; Females; Foreign Countries; Australia |
Abstract | The use of reflective learning journals to encourage higher order learning outcomes is a growing area in higher education research and practice. However, without a unified and clear definition of reflection, identifying and assessing reflection is problematic for educators. In an attempt to address this issue, in 1999 Kember and colleagues devised a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow, to identify and assess levels of reflective thinking in students' written journals. We evaluated the usefulness of this coding scheme in a business education context. Findings revealed that the scheme was useful in identifying categories of reflective thinking. Inter-coder agreement was 0.802 which is satisfactory. On average, 65% of the journal content was coded as non-reflection and 35% as reflection. A further outcome of the research was to refine the coding scheme and to provide suggestions for its application in teaching practice. (Contains 1 table and 2 figures.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |