A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education

Autor/inn/en	Reddy, Y. Malini; Andrade, Heidi
Titel	A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education
Quelle	In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (2010) 4, S.435-448 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0260-2938
Schlagwörter	Higher Education; College Students; Research Methodology; Validity; Scoring Rubrics; Student Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Evaluation Research; Interrater Reliability; Teacher Attitudes; College Faculty; Student Attitudes; Academic Achievement; Program Evaluation; Formative Evaluation + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Collegestudent; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Gültigkeit; Scoring formulas; Auswertungsbogen; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Evaluationsforschung; Interrater-Reliabilität; Lehrerverhalten; Fakultät; Schülerverhalten; Schulleistung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation
Abstract	This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post-secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts. (Contains 1 table.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10