Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enJans, Bert; Peters, Judith C.; De Weerd, Peter
TitelPostscript: Split Spatial Attention? The Data Remain Difficult to Interpret
QuelleIn: Psychological Review, 117 (2010) 2, S.682-684 (3 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN0033-295X
DOI10.1037/0033-295X.117.2.682
SchlagwörterModels; Visual Perception; Spatial Ability; Attention; Cognitive Processes; Stimuli; Cues
AbstractA growing number of studies claim that spatial attention can be split "on demand" into several, segregated foci of enhanced processing. Intrigued by the theoretical ramifications of this proposal, we analyzed 19 relevant sets of experiments using four methodological criteria. We typically found several methodological limitations in each study that precluded convincing conclusions. Cave, Bush and Taylor, however, find our criteria unnecessarily constraining and suggest that we have a theoretical bias that prevented us from considering valid evidence for divided spatial attention. Discussing the existence of split spatial attention in the context of real-life examples and theoretical models has its limits. The question can be settled empirically by excluding unified spatial attention in experiments testing divided spatial attention. Where to place attentional probes relative to targets to exclude unified attention (Criterion 4) is central to the debate we have with Cave et al. We propose that with dense enough probing of attention, a single experiment can exclude all nonunitary attention distributions and reveal any attention distribution irrespective of theoretical preconceptions. This is not an impossible ambition, and until such experiments are performed, current evidence on the division of spatial attention will remain difficult to interpret. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenAmerican Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Psychological Review" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: