Discretion over Valor: The AAUP during the McCarthy Years

Autor/in	Aby, Stephen H.
Titel	Discretion over Valor: The AAUP during the McCarthy Years
Quelle	In: American Educational History Journal, 36 (2009) 1, S.121-132 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1535-0584
Schlagwörter	Professional Associations; College Faculty; United States History; Behavior; Fear; Social Systems; Patriotism; Political Attitudes; Political Influences; Social Influences; Higher Education; Academic Freedom; Politics of Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Fakultät; Furcht; Social system; Soziales System; Patriotismus; Political attitude; Politische Einstellung; Political influence; Politischer Einfluss; Sozialer Einfluss; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Akademische Freiheit; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik
Abstract	In recent years, there has been considerable and renewed interest in the effects of McCarthyism on academia. Ellen Schrecker's "No Ivory Tower" (1986), Lionel Lewis' "Cold War on Campus" (1988), David Holmes' "Stalking the Academic Communist" (1989), Charles McCormick's "This Nest of Vipers" (1989), Neil Hamilton's "Zealotry and Academic Freedom" (1995), and David Price's "Threatening Anthropology" (2004) all amply demonstrate how politicians, university administrators, and many faculty readily sacrificed academic freedom and civil liberties to rid America of subversives, to protect their own jobs, or to save the reputations and funding of their universities. Arguably, academic freedom has never been as much at risk as it was during this period. But where was the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) while this was going on? Founded in 1915 as a professional association of faculty, the AAUP had developed the mechanism and the wherewithal to investigate colleges and universities that had violated standards of academic freedom and due process. Surely this set of circumstances, in which individuals exercising their academic rights or protesting academic freedom violations were vulnerable at their own institutions, was just what the AAUP was intended to address. Yet by all accounts the AAUP was derelict in fulfilling these responsibilities during the most crucial years and cases of the McCarthy period. The conventional explanation for this points the blame primarily at one individual. Yet there is evidence that the AAUP's timidity and acquiescence was more systemic and broadly rooted in faculty attitudes toward Communists. This paper is an attempt to make that case and provides an alternative analysis for the AAUP's absence. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc. P.O. Box 79049, Charlotte, NC 28271-7047. Tel: 704-752-9125; Fax: 704-752-9113; e-mail: infoage@infoagepub.com; Web site: http://www.infoagepub.com/products/journals/aehj/index.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10