Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Vitton, Charles J.; Wasonga, Teresa A. |
---|---|
Titel | Between Kohlberg and Gilligan: Levels of Moral Judgment among Elementary School Principals |
Quelle | In: Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8 (2009) 1, S.92-116 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1570-0763 |
Schlagwörter | Moral Issues; Value Judgment; Moral Development; Principals; Administrator Behavior; Administrator Attitudes; Elementary Schools; Schemata (Cognition); Schematic Studies; Psychometrics; Replication (Evaluation); Evaluation Research; Behaviorism |
Abstract | This research investigated levels of moral judgment among public elementary school principals as measured by the Defining Issues Test Version 2 for occupationally relevant and other moral dilemmas. The participants scored lower (38.7) than the predicted average P score (postconventional thinking) for individuals who have attained graduate level education (53.3) or general adults (40). Of the independent variables studied, only political views had a significant impact on moral judgment. Women, younger participants, and those with higher academic degrees scored higher. Although these findings are limited to the interpretations of participants, they demonstrate how neo-Kohlbergian research is responding to criticisms of Kohlberg. (Contains 2 tables.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |