Vicissitudes of a Misnomer: Reply to Dalgleish (2005)

Autor/inn/en	Chajut, Eran; Lev, Shlomo; Algom, Daniel
Titel	Vicissitudes of a Misnomer: Reply to Dalgleish (2005)
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (2005) 4, S.592-595 (4 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0096-3445
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Stimuli; Visual Learning; Measures (Individuals); Visual Discrimination; Attention; Behavior Patterns; Cognitive Processes; Review (Reexamination); Persuasive Discourse; Criticism + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Anreizsystem; Visual education; Visuelles Lernen; Messdaten; Aufmerksamkeit; Cognitive process; Kognitiver Prozess; Wiederholungsprüfung; Persuasion; Persuasive Kommunikation; Kritik
Abstract	The Stroop effect is psychology's classic measure gauging the selectivity of attention to individual attributes of complex stimuli. The emotional Stroop effect gauges the influence on behavior of threat and emotional stimuli. The former taps central/executive processes abstracted from particular stimulus contexts, whereas the latter taps automatic processes inextricably linked to particular stimuli in the environment. T. Dalgleish raised concerns about the data and theory that support the separateness of the 2 effects (D. Algom, E. Chajut, & S. Lev). The present reply shows that Dalgleish's objections are unwarranted and that the term emotional Stroop effect blurs the deep conceptual divide separating the 2 phenomena. (Author).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10