A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System

Autor/inn/en	Maassen, Gerard H.; Verschueren, Karine
Titel	A Two-Dimensional Ratings-Based Procedure for Sociometric Status Determination as an Alternative to the Asher and Dodge System
Quelle	In: Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 51 (2005) 2, S.192-212 (21 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0272-930X
Schlagwörter	Elementary School Students; Student Attitudes; Play; Peer Relationship; Peer Acceptance; Sociometric Techniques; Evaluation Methods; Student Behavior; Aggression; Personality Traits + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Schülerverhalten; Spiel; Peer-Beziehungen; Soziometrie; Student behaviour; Individual characteristics; Personality characteristic; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal
Abstract	The present study compares the results of three two-dimensional procedures for sociometric status determination: the Asher and Dodge (1986) system, the rating scale method SSrat of Maassen, Akkermans, and Van der Linden (1996), and the nomination procedure of Coie and Dodge (1983). The study followed 170 children from third grade through sixth grade. Children were asked (a) to nominate the classmates with whom they most liked and least liked to play, and (b) to rate how much they liked to play with each of their classmates. The SSrat method determines sociometric status with higher validity and stability than do the other two methods. SSrat's methodological strengths and practical advantages as compared to the Asher and Dodge system demonstrate that it is a valuable, if not preferable, alternative for determining children's sociometric status in situations where the use of a rating scale is appropriate. (Author).
Anmerkungen	Wayne State University Press, The Leonard N. Simons Building, 4809 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201-1309. Tel: 800-978-7323 (Toll Free); Fax: 313-577-6131.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10