Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Kent, Thomas H.; Albanese, Mark A. |
---|---|
Titel | A Comparison of the Relative Efficiency and Validity of Tailored Tests and Conventional Quizzes. |
Quelle | In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, 10 (1987) 1, S.67-79 |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
Schlagwörter | Adaptive Testing; Comparative Testing; Computer Assisted Testing; Difficulty Level; Higher Education; Item Analysis; Latent Trait Theory; Medical Students; Multiple Choice Tests; Predictive Validity; Test Items; Test Validity |
Abstract | Two types of computer-administered unit quizzes in a systematic pathology course for second-year medical students were compared. Quizzes composed of questions selected on the basis of a student's ability had higher correlations with the final examination than did quizzes composed of questions randomly selected from topic areas. (Author/JAZ) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |