Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Zhang, Ruofei; Zou, Di; Cheng, Gary |
|---|---|
| Titel | Chatbot-Based Training on Logical Fallacy in EFL Argumentative Writing |
| Quelle | In: Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17 (2023) 5, S.932-945 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Zhang, Ruofei) ORCID (Zou, Di) ORCID (Cheng, Gary) |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1750-1229 |
| DOI | 10.1080/17501229.2023.2197417 |
| Schlagwörter | English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Persuasive Discourse; Writing Instruction; Undergraduate Students; Foreign Countries; Artificial Intelligence; Man Machine Systems; Natural Language Processing; Student Attitudes; Misconceptions; Logical Thinking; China |
| Abstract | EFL learners generally have the problem of logical fallacies in EFL argumentative writings. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can undermine EFL argumentative writing quality. Explicit training on logical fallacies may help learners deal with the problem and enhance their self-efficacy and proficiency in EFL argumentative writing, which educational chatbots may further enhance. However, few studies have been conducted in this direction. To fill the gap, we developed a chatbot for out-of-class, self-regulated training on logical fallacies in EFL argumentative writing. Fifteen Chinese EFL undergraduate and graduate students engaged in the training for five weeks. Semi-structured interviews and transcript analysis were conducted to investigate the participants' perceived impacts of the training on self-efficacy and proficiency in EFL argumentative writing. To triangulate the interview results, we conducted pre-post questionnaires on the participants' writing self-efficacy and analysed their pre-post argumentative writings based on the Illinois Critical Thinking Essay Scoring Rubric. The results showed that the training on logical fallacies might improve EFL argumentative writing proficiency, although it might reduce writing self-efficacy. Based on the results, we called for more implementation and investigation of chatbot-based training on logical fallacies, especially the long-term training integrated with practice in writing tasks. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
