Motivational Practices in Reading Interventions for Students with or at Risk for Dyslexia: Literature Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Cho, Eunsoo; Dahl-Leonard, Katlynn; Kehoe, Karen; Capin, Philip; Hall, Colby; Solari, Emily
Titel	Motivational Practices in Reading Interventions for Students with or at Risk for Dyslexia: Literature Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
Quelle	In: Topics in Language Disorders, 43 (2023) 2, S.119-145 (27 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0271-8294
DOI	10.1097/TLD.0000000000000312
Schlagwörter	Elementary School Students; Kindergarten; Young Children; Dyslexia; At Risk Students; Reading Instruction; Intervention; Student Motivation; Educational Practices; Word Recognition; Reading Comprehension; Reading Difficulties; Educational Strategies + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Frühe Kindheit; Dyslexics; Legasthenie; Lese-Rechtschreib-Schwäche; Leseunterricht; Schulische Motivation; Bildungspraxis; Worterkennung; Leseverstehen; Reading difficulty; Leseschwierigkeit; Lehrstrategie
Abstract	The purposes of this study were to (a) describe the extent to which motivational practices are incorporated in foundational reading interventions for students with or at risk for dyslexia in kindergarten through Grade 5 (K-5) and (b) explore whether the presence and type of motivational practices (i.e., supports vs. strategies) within foundational reading interventions influenced the magnitude of the intervention effects on reading outcomes. We analyzed the same set of studies as Hall et al. (2022), who meta-analyzed experimental and quasi-experimental research of reading interventions implemented with K-5 students with or at risk for dyslexia from 1980 to 2020. Results of the current study show that only 44% of the interventions included motivational practices. The majority (84%) of those interventions addressed student motivation and engagement through motivational supports, such as game-like activities, paired work, and setting improvement goals. A much smaller percentage (16%) provided explicit motivational strategy instruction. Results indicated that reading interventions that include direct motivational strategy instruction tend to have larger effects on reading outcomes than both interventions without any motivational practices and those that include motivational supports only. The positive effect of motivational strategy instruction was stronger on measures of word reading than overall reading or reading comprehension outcomes. These findings highlight the need to address motivational challenges of students with reading difficulties and lend insight into how foundational reading skills interventions can be bolstered through incorporating motivational strategy instruction. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Available from: Wolters Kluwer. 351 West Camden Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. Tel: 800-638-3030; e-mail: MR-WKCustomerSupport@wolterskluwer.com; Web site: https://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01