Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Ernest, Brian W.; Obery, Amanda; Sullivan-Walker, Melissa; Reaves, Melanie; Dahle-Huff, Kari |
---|---|
Titel | Why Did We Do This? Collective Faculty Motivations to Engage in Accreditation Work |
Quelle | In: Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 34 (2023) 1, S.69-81 (13 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Ernest, Brian W.) ORCID (Obery, Amanda) ORCID (Sullivan-Walker, Melissa) ORCID (Reaves, Melanie) ORCID (Dahle-Huff, Kari) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2637-8965 |
Schlagwörter | Accreditation (Institutions); Teacher Education Programs; Teacher Educators; College Faculty; Educational Change; Evaluation Methods; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Motivation; Teacher Collaboration; Teacher Administrator Relationship; Teacher Participation; Graduate Study; Undergraduate Study; Program Descriptions; Barriers; Incentives; Program Improvement; Academic Rank (Professional) |
Abstract | Teacher education faculty are often expected to engage in accreditation work. Our purpose was to document the collective driving mechanisms of junior faculty who volunteered to redesign key accreditation assessments. Specifically, we explored the values and expectations for success that led junior faculty to engage in and persist through key accreditation reform. Findings include eleven themes organized into three categories: drivers to join, hurdles, and drivers to continue. We interpret the results through Eccles and Wigfield's (2020) Situated Expectancy Value Theory and highlight the critical role that other colleagues and internal and external pressures played in undertaking the accreditation process. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association. Web site: http://www.nrmera.org/educational-research-theory-practice/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |