Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Collier, Jessica R.; Pillai, Raunak M.; Fazio, Lisa K. |
---|---|
Titel | Multiple-Choice Quizzes Improve Memory for Misinformation Debunks, but Do Not Reduce Belief in Misinformation |
Quelle | In: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8 (2023), Artikel 37 (18 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Collier, Jessica R.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
DOI | 10.1186/s41235-023-00488-9 |
Schlagwörter | Informed Consent; Audits (Verification); Multiple Choice Tests; Beliefs; Misinformation; Memory; Accuracy; Evidence; Misconceptions |
Abstract | Fact-checkers want people to both read and remember their misinformation debunks. Retrieval practice is one way to increase memory, thus multiple-choice quizzes may be a useful tool for fact-checkers. We tested whether exposure to quizzes improved people's accuracy ratings for fact-checked claims and their memory for specific information within a fact check. Across three experiments, 1551 US-based online participants viewed fact checks (either health- or politics-related) with or without a quiz. Overall, the fact checks were effective, and participants were more accurate in rating the claims after exposure. In addition, quizzes improved participants' memory for the details of the fact checks, even 1 week later. However, that increased memory did not lead to more accurate beliefs. Participants' accuracy ratings were similar in the quiz and no-quiz conditions. Multiple-choice quizzes can be a useful tool for increasing memory, but there is a disconnect between memory and belief. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |