The Integration of Undergraduate Students' Informal and Formal Inferential Reasoning

Autor/inn/en	Gómez-Blancarte, Ana Luisa; Tobías-Lara, María Guadalupe
Titel	The Integration of Undergraduate Students' Informal and Formal Inferential Reasoning
Quelle	In: Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113 (2023) 2, S.251-269 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Gómez-Blancarte, Ana Luisa)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0013-1954
DOI	10.1007/s10649-022-10205-w
Schlagwörter	Undergraduate Students; Inferences; Thinking Skills; Abstract Reasoning; Learning Processes; Integrated Activities + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Inference; Inferenz; Denkfähigkeit; Abstraktes Denken; Denken; Learning process; Lernprozess; Integrierender Unterricht
Abstract	Since statistical inference is a probabilistic generalization about a population analyzed on the basis of a sample, inferential reasoning demands producing reasons ("statistical" and "contextual") to substantiate and validate generalizations. To convey an understanding of students' inferential reasoning, we present a proposal--based on Toulmin's argumentation model--in which the production of statistical and contextual reasons serve as fundamental components of students' inferential reasoning by providing supporting arguments that can be expressed as a sequence of statements. We analyze the inferential reasoning of university students asked to work in teams on an inferential activity in the context of environmental pollution. Results show that they integrated informal and formal methods to produce statistical reasons, complemented by contextual reasons to support their conclusions. Their reasoning model allowed us to identify (a) a potential transition from informal to formal inferential reasoning; and (b) ambiguity, or an absence of expressions of uncertainty, about generalizations regarding the population, possibly related to their confidence in using formal methods (e.g., hypothesis testing). We conclude that our proposal helps encourage and analyze students' inferential reasoning. Future research will require clearer definitions of the characteristics of the argumentation model in the field of statistical inferential reasoning because arguments depend on their disciplinary context. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01