Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Camodeca, Amy |
---|---|
Titel | Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales--3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children |
Quelle | In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53 (2023) 5, S.2112-2126 (15 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Camodeca, Amy) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0162-3257 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10803-022-05483-5 |
Schlagwörter | Autism Spectrum Disorders; Rating Scales; Children; Diagnostic Tests; Test Validity; Correlation; Clinical Diagnosis; Disability Identification; Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule |
Abstract | There is limited research regarding the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition (GARS-3) despite its extensive use. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule--2nd Edition (ADOS-2) was provided to 186 clinically referred children suspected of autism ([x-bar] age = 8.98; Autism [AUT] n = 87; Not Autism [NOT] n = 99). Mean difference analyses, Logistic Regressions, and ROC analyses were non-significant for both Autism Index scores. The author-suggested cutoff score of 70 correctly classified approximately 47% of participants, with false positive rates = 82.83-87.88%. ADOS-2 correlations were significantly lower vis-à-vis the standardization sample. The Social Interaction subscale demonstrated weak, marginal results, and sensitivity/specificity could not be optimized. In its current form, the GARS-3 does not demonstrate adequate criterion validity for use in assessment of complex community samples. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |