Disputes around Assessments in Early Childhood Education in Brazil

Autor/inn/en	Rodrigues, Cibele Maria Lima; de Almeida, Karla Wanessa Carvalho; Simões, Patrícia Maria Uchôa
Titel	Disputes around Assessments in Early Childhood Education in Brazil
Quelle	In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30 (2022) 134, (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Rodrigues, Cibele Maria Lima) ORCID (de Almeida, Karla Wanessa Carvalho) ORCID (Simões, Patrícia Maria Uchôa)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Standardized Tests; Student Evaluation; Early Childhood Education; Neoliberalism; Politics of Education; Educational Quality; Democracy; Educational Policy; Access to Education; Civil Rights; Discourse Analysis; Articulation (Education); Brazil + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Standadised tests; Standardisierter Test; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Early childhood; Education; Frühkindliche Bildung; Frühpädagogik; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Demokratie; Politics of education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; Diskursanalyse; Articulation; Artikulation (Ling); Artikulation; Aussprache; Brasilien
Abstract	The debate around standardized assessments became a global agenda imposed by multilateral organizations. These tests, in the neoliberal context, impose an impoverishment of the curriculum and also strong control over the teaching work. On the other hand, it also causes resistance from social movements. This paper addresses this process of disputes for hegemony in the context of early childhood education in Brazil within the last few years. This research analyses the protagonism of the Inter-Forum Movement of Early Childhood Education in Brazil (MIEIB) in the context of the Workers' Party administrations (Lula and Dilma). During this period, the movement had an amicable relationship with the federal administrations, which opened discussions about different ways to evaluate educational quality, based on the discourse of the right to education. Currently, this democratic dialogue no longer exists and the relations between the movement and the federal administration has become antagonistic, as the Bolsonaro administration wishes extend tests to early childhood education. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Colleges of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. c/o Editor, USF EDU162, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5650. Tel: 813-974-3400; Fax: 813-974-3826; Web site: https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/epaa
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01