Amenable Deaths among Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Including Down Syndrome: An Ontario Population-Based Cohort Study

Autor/inn/en	Lin, Elizabeth; Lunsky, Yona; Chung, Hannah; Durbin, Anna; Volpe, Tiziana; Dobranowski, Kristin; Benadict, Mary Benisha; Balogh, Robert
Titel	Amenable Deaths among Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Including Down Syndrome: An Ontario Population-Based Cohort Study
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36 (2023) 1, S.165-175 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Lin, Elizabeth) ORCID (Lunsky, Yona) ORCID (Durbin, Anna)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1360-2322
DOI	10.1111/jar.13047
Schlagwörter	Death; Intellectual Disability; Developmental Disabilities; Mortality Rate; Down Syndrome; Etiology + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Sterbefall; Tod; Todesfall; Intellect; Disability; Disabilities; Verstand; Behinderung; Entwicklungsstörung; Mortalitätsrate; 'Downs Syndrome; Down''s Syndrome'; Down-Syndrom; Ätiologie
Abstract	Background: Rates of death and avoidable deaths are reportedly higher among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This study contributes to our understanding of how mortality and intellectual and development disabilities are associated. Method: General population and intellectual and developmental disabilities adult cohorts were defined using linked administrative data. All-cause and amenable deaths between 2010 and 2015 were reported for these cohorts and subcohorts with and without Down syndrome. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of potential contributors to amenable deaths. Results: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities had higher all-cause (6.1 vs. 1.6%) and amenable death percentages (21.4 vs. 14.1%) than general population comparators. Within intellectual and developmental disabilities, those with Down syndrome had higher all-cause (12.0 vs. 6.0%) but lower amenable death percentages (19.2 vs. 21.8%) than those without. Conclusions: Results suggest that interventions to reduce amenable deaths target provider-care-recipient interactions and coordination across care and support sectors. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01