Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Asgar, Ali; Satyanarayana, Rampelli |
---|---|
Titel | An Evaluation of Faculty Development Programme on the Design and Development of Self-Learning Materials for Open Distance Learning |
Quelle | In: Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16 (2021) 1, S.98-115 (18 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2414-6994 |
DOI | 10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2020-0094 |
Schlagwörter | Program Evaluation; Faculty Development; Independent Study; Open Universities; Distance Education; Instructional Materials; Program Effectiveness; Educational Objectives; Feedback (Response); Teacher Attitudes; Foreign Countries; Educational Improvement; College Faculty; Curriculum Development; Capacity Building; India Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Selbststudium; Offene Universität; Distance study; Distance learning; Fernunterricht; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel; Lehrerverhalten; Ausland; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Fakultät; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Indien |
Abstract | Purpose: This paper seeks to ascertain the effectiveness of a two-week-long faculty development programme (FDP), organized by Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), for teachers of the open and distance learning (ODL) system, with the aim of upgrading their knowledge and skills for developing print self-learning materials (SLMs). The specific aim of this study is to ascertain whether the objectives of the FDP have been achieved, to examine the effectiveness of the training programme and to suggest measures for improvement in future FDPs regarding the design and development of print SLMs. Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted using a descriptive survey research method, through semi-structured questionnaires and adopted purposive sampling. The first survey was conducted immediately after the completion of the programme, in order to collect feedback from the trainees, while the second survey was conducted after six months of the FDP, using the follow-up approach, so that more reliable and authentic results could be obtained. Findings: The outcomes of the study revealed that the training had been effective in imparting appropriate knowledge and skills to the trainees, with respect to designing print SLMs. However, certain gaps were also identified and have been reported in this paper. Key suggestions have been made to address the shortcomings and improve forthcoming FDPs. Research limitations/implications: The present research focused on a specific training programme regarding the design and development of SLMs. Therefore, only the teachers and academics who participated in this specialized training activity were considered for the collection of feedback. Practical implications: The recommendations of this work may be useful for the trainers, FDP coordinators, training institutions and ODL policymakers for planning and designing effective staff development activities for teachers and academics working in ODL institutions. These would be especially useful in the design of FDPs, aimed at orienting teachers who are involved in curriculum planning, design and development of learning resources. Originality/value: This study is an original research based on the empirical primary data obtained by the researchers. As the largest open university in the world, IGNOU has been playing a key role in staff development for and in ODL in developing countries. This evaluative study of a specialized FDP in the area of SLM design and development is a significant work that may be valuable for planning the staff development strategies and building a training evaluation mechanism. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |