Hand Drawing as a Tool to Facilitate Understanding in Undergraduate Human Biology: A Critical Review of the Literature and Future Perspectives

Autor/in	Peart, Daniel J.
Titel	Hand Drawing as a Tool to Facilitate Understanding in Undergraduate Human Biology: A Critical Review of the Literature and Future Perspectives
Quelle	In: Studies in Science Education, 58 (2022) 1, S.81-93 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Peart, Daniel J.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0305-7267
DOI	10.1080/03057267.2021.1913321
Schlagwörter	Freehand Drawing; Biology; Science Instruction; Teaching Methods; Undergraduate Students; Task Analysis; Student Attitudes; Learning Processes; Comparative Analysis; Instructional Effectiveness; Databases; Research Reports; Anatomy; Physiology + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Drawing; Zeichnen; Biologie; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Aufgabenanalyse; Schülerverhalten; Learning process; Lernprozess; Unterrichtserfolg; Datenbank; Research report; Forschungsbericht; Anatomie; Physiologie
Abstract	Science and drawing have been paired for hundreds of years, and this synergy is still prevalent in research investigating the role of drawing for developing and assessing understanding. However, despite research at the primary and secondary levels of education, there is limited research on whether drawing facilitates learning at the undergraduate level, particularly in human biology. This subject is specifically important to focus on as it can be a core subject on some multidisciplinary programmes that do not require a science background at entry. The literature reviewed in this paper highlights that drawing tasks are well received by students and that they perceive the tasks to be helpful for their understanding. There is also some evidence that it might improve learning. However, this cannot be concluded with confidence due to some limitations with respect to comparison groups, including such a group being absent, using retrospective cohorts as a control, and not controlling for instruction between groups. Furthermore, some of the reported improvements in tests are practically very small. More work is warranted in this area as there is a risk that misconceptions can be passed on to students and between students using this type of teaching activity. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01