Boundary Spanning Roles and Power in Educational Partnerships

Autor/inn/en	Wegemer, Christopher M.; Renick, Jennifer
Titel	Boundary Spanning Roles and Power in Educational Partnerships
Quelle	In: AERA Open, 7 (2021) 1, (14 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Wegemer, Christopher M.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2332-8584
Schlagwörter	Power Structure; Partnerships in Education; Expertise; Theory Practice Relationship; Educational Improvement; Longitudinal Studies; Case Studies; Graduate Students; Student Attitudes; Organizational Culture; Instructional Design; Organizational Change; Youth Programs; Out of School Youth; Sociocultural Patterns; Decision Making; Personal Autonomy; Low Income Students; Hispanic American Students; Student Role; California + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulpartnerschaft; Expert appraisal; Theorie-Praxis-Beziehung; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Longitudinal study; Longitudinal method; Longitudinal methods; Längsschnittuntersuchung; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Schülerverhalten; Unternehmenskultur; Lesson concept; Lessonplan; Unterrichtsentwurf; Organisationswandel; Jugendsofortprogramm; Soziokulturelle Theorie; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Individuelle Autonomie; Hispanic; Hispanic Americans; Hispanoamerikaner; Schüler; Schülerin; Kalifornien
Abstract	Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) offer promising approaches to improve educational outcomes. Navigating boundaries between contexts is essential for RPP effectiveness, yet much work remains to establish a conceptual framework of boundary spanning in partnerships. Our longitudinal comparative case study draws from our experiences as graduate student boundary spanners in three long-term partnerships to examine boundary spanning roles in RPPs, with particular attention to the ways in which power permeates partnership work. Using qualitative, critically reflexive analysis of meeting artifacts and field notes, we found that our boundary spanning roles varied along five spectrums: institutional focus, task orientation, expertise, partnership disposition, and agency. Our roles were shaped by the organizational, cultural, relational, and historical features of the partnerships and contexts of interaction. We aim to promote the development of effective RPP strategies by leveraging the perspectives and positionality of graduate students in order to advance understanding of boundary spanning roles. [This citation information printed on the PDF is incorrect. This article is in v7 n1 Jan-Dec 2021.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01