Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters

Autor/inn/en	Lemos, Fabiana Aparecida; da Silva Nunes, Aryelly Dayane; de Souza Evangelista, Carolina Karla; Escera, Carles; Taveira, Karinna Veríssimo Meira; Balen, Sheila Andreoli
Titel	Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters
Quelle	In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64 (2021) 6, S.2085-2102 (18 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Lemos, Fabiana Aparecida) ORCID (da Silva Nunes, Aryelly Dayane) ORCID (de Souza Evangelista, Carolina Karla) ORCID (Escera, Carles) ORCID (Taveira, Karinna Veríssimo Meira) ORCID (Balen, Sheila Andreoli)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1092-4388
Schlagwörter	Neonates; Infants; Auditory Perception; Speech; Brain; Cognitive Measurement + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Neugeborenes Kind; Infant; Toddler; Toddlers; Kleinkind; Auditive Wahrnehmung; Akustische Wahrnehmung; Akustik; Speaking; Sprechen; Gehirn
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize parameters used for frequency-following response (FFR) acquisition in children up to 24 months of age through a systematic review. Method: The study was registered in PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' recommendations. Search was performed in six databases (LILACS, LIVIVO, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and gray literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey, ProQuest)as well as via manual searches in bibliographic references. Observational studies using speech stimuli to elicit the FFR in infants with normal hearing on the age range from 0 until 24 months were included. No restrictions regarding language and year of publication were applied. Risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Data on stimulus, presentation rate, time window for analysis, number of sweeps, artifact rejection, online filters, stimulated ear, and examination condition were extracted. Results: Four hundred fifty-nine studies were identified. After removing duplicates and reading titles and abstracts, 15 articles were included. Seven studies were classified as low risk of bias, seven as moderate risk, and one as high risk. Conclusions: There is a consensus in the use of some acquisition parameters of the FFR with speech stimulus, such as the vertical mounting, the use of alternating polarity, a sampling rate of 20000 Hz, and the /da/ synthesized syllable of 40 ms in duration as the preferred stimulus. Although these parameters show some consensus, the results disclosed lack of a single established protocol for FFR acquisition with speech stimulus in infants in the investigated age range. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01