Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Makarchuk, Donald |
---|---|
Titel | Recall Efficacy in EFL Learning |
Quelle | In: English Teaching, 73 (2018) 2, S.115-138 (24 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1017-7108 |
Schlagwörter | Recall (Psychology); Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; English (Second Language); Undergraduate Students; North American English; English for Academic Purposes; Vocabulary Development; Study Habits; Learning Strategies; Language Processing; Memory; Retention (Psychology); Language Tests; Test Format; Multiple Choice Tests; Foreign Countries; South Korea Abberufung; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Fremdsprachenunterricht; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Amerikanisches Englisch; Wortschatzarbeit; Study behavior; Study behaviour; Studienverhalten; Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; Sprachverarbeitung; Gedächtnis; Merkfähigkeit; Language test; Sprachtest; Testentwicklung; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Ausland; Korea; Republik |
Abstract | This study investigated the efficacy of retrieving EFL vocabulary from memory as a long-term retention strategy. Three learning treatments, rereading, recognizing and recalling target words, were compared with the assistance of 74 university students who underwent the treatments to learn academic American English during a 15-week semester. In addition to investigating the efficacy of the learning treatments, the study explored the effects of recognition and recall testing in relation to the treatments for possible interactions between learning treatment and test format. The study found that while rereading was the preferred student study strategy, recalling words was a more efficacious learning practice. Recognition learning was also less effective than recalling words, which suggests that the use of recall tests will promote long-term retention more than recognition tests such as multiple-choice tests. Learning treatment and test format comparisons suggested that the retrieval of words as a learning strategy was likely to be the most effective study practice regardless of test type despite transfer-appropriate processing inconsistencies. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Korea Association of Teachers of English. 6105 English Education Department, Chinju National University of Education, 369beon-gil 3, Jinyangho-ro, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52673, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-42-629-7381; Fax: +82-42-629-7320; e-mail: katejournal29@gmail.com; Web site: http://journal.kate.or.kr/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |