Leading Issues in Implementation of Farmer Field Schools: A Global Survey

Autor/inn/en	van den Berg, Henk; Phillips, Suzanne; Poisot, Anne-Sophie; Dicke, Marcel; Fredrix, Marjon
Titel	Leading Issues in Implementation of Farmer Field Schools: A Global Survey
Quelle	In: Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27 (2021) 3, S.341-353 (13 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (van den Berg, Henk) ORCID (Dicke, Marcel)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1389-224X
DOI	10.1080/1389224X.2020.1858891
Schlagwörter	Agricultural Education; Foreign Countries; Program Design; Program Implementation; Adult Vocational Education; Program Evaluation; Africa; Asia; Middle East; Europe; Latin America + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Agriculture; Education; Landwirtschaftliche Ausbildung; Landwirtschaft; Ausbildung; Ausland; Programme design; Programmaufbau; Programmplanung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Afrika; Asien; Vorderasien; Europa; Lateinamerika
Abstract	Purpose: The Farmer Field School (FFS) has been used to enable farmers to adapt their farming decisions according to the field situation. This paper explores the methodological state, challenges and lessons learned, of the FFS around the World. Design/methodology/approach: We used a 52-item questionnaire to capture issues of design, implementation and evaluation of the FFS. Completed questionnaires were received from 57 ongoing or recent FFS programmes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Findings: FFS programmes have diversified, including multiple crops and livestock. Farmer involvement in the design and planning of interventions was found to be critical. FFS programmes increasingly relied on farmers as FFS facilitators. Short training duration for FFS facilitators raised concern about FFS quality. Even though mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation were mostly in place, capacity for data analysis and data utilization were a concern. Practical implications: Results highlight strengths and shortcomings in design, implementation and evaluation of the FFS. The information acquired can be used to support the quality of ongoing and future programmes. Theoretical implications: This research contributed to understanding that the educational foundations of the FFS should be reflected in programme design and evaluation. Originality/value: Many studies of the FFS exist, but this is the first global overview on how farmer field school programmes are carried out, with various lessons learned. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01