Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Lenz, Katja; Wittmann, Gerald |
---|---|
Titel | Individual Differences in Conceptual and Procedural Fraction Knowledge: What Makes the Difference and What Does It Look Like? |
Quelle | In: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16 (2021) 1, (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Lenz, Katja) ORCID (Wittmann, Gerald) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1306-3030 |
Schlagwörter | Individual Differences; Fractions; Mathematics Instruction; Teaching Methods; Institutional Characteristics; Instructional Program Divisions; Gender Differences; Social Class; Secondary School Students; Cognitive Ability; Mathematical Concepts; Mathematics Skills; Foreign Countries; Correlation; Mathematics Tests; Germany Individueller Unterschied; Bruchrechnung; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Geschlechterkonflikt; Social classes; Soziale Klasse; Sekundarschüler; Denkfähigkeit; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematics ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Ausland; Korrelation; Deutschland |
Abstract | There is a general consensus that both conceptual and procedural knowledge are essential for students' mathematical development. A common argument is that differences in mathematical performance are caused by differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge. Therefore, it is important to investigate to what extent such differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge are empirically evident at the level of individual students. Accordingly, the aim of the present study is to describe individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge using the example of fractions and to analyze their relationship to the covariates grade level, school type, school, class, gender, and general cognitive abilities. Data from 377 students in grades 8 and 9 from 18 classes at four schools in Germany was examined. A hierarchical cluster analysis showed five clusters which reflected individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge. The clusters were characterized by (a) equal strengths in conceptual and procedural knowledge, (b) relative strengths in procedural knowledge compared to conceptual knowledge, (c) relative weaknesses in procedural knowledge compared to conceptual knowledge. Cluster membership was not related to gender or grade level, whereas the school type, school, and grade level were relevant for cluster membership. A stronger correlation between conceptual knowledge and general cognitive abilities could only be confirmed to a limited extent. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Suite 124, Challenge House 616 Mitcham Road, CR0 3AA, Croydon, London, UK. Tel: +44-208-936-7681; e-mail: iejme@iejme.com; Web site: https://www.iejme.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |