Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Fergusson, Lee; Harmes, Marcus; Hayes, Fiona; Rahmann, Christopher |
|---|---|
| Titel | Lines-of-Inquiry and Sources of Evidence in Work-Based Research |
| Quelle | In: Work Based Learning e-Journal International, 8 (2019) 2, S.85-105 (21 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 2044-7868 |
| Schlagwörter | Research; Inquiry; Evidence; Foreign Countries; Police; Primary Sources; Research Methodology; Semi Structured Interviews; Focus Groups; Surveys; Archives; Observation; Participant Observation; Graduate Study; Professional Education; Employment; Australia |
| Abstract | There is synergy between the investigative practices of police detectives and social scientists, including work-based researchers. They both develop lines-of-inquiry and draw on multiple sources of evidence in order to make inferences about people, trends and phenomena. However, the principles associated with lines-of-inquiry and sources of evidence have not so far been examined in relation to work-based research methods, which are often unexplored or ill-defined in the published literature. We explore this gap by examining the various direct and indirect lines-of-inquiry and the main sources of primary and secondary evidence used in work-based research, which is especially relevant because some work-based researchers are also police detectives. Clearer understanding of these intersections will be useful in emerging professional contexts where the work-based researcher, the detective, and the social scientist cohere in the one person and their research project. The case we examined was a Professional Studies programme at a university in Australia, which has many police detectives doing work-based research, and from their experience we conclude there is synergy between work-based research and lines of enquiry. Specifically, in the context of research methods, we identify seven sources of evidence: (1) creative, unstructured, and semi-structured interviews; (2) structured interviews; (3) consensus group methods; (4) surveys; (5) documentation and archives; (6) direct observations and participant observations; and (7) physical or cultural artefacts, and show their methodological features related to data and method type, reliability, validity, and types of analysis, along with their respective advantages and disadvantages. This study thereby unpacks and isolates those characteristics of work-based research which are relevant to a growing body of literature related to the messy, co-produced and wicked problems of private companies, government agencies, and non-government organisations and the research methods used to investigate them. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Middlesex University. Web site: https://wblearning-ejournal.com/en/home |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
