Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enHuang, Yu; Jun Zhang, Lawrence
TitelDoes a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students' Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings from an Intervention Study
QuelleIn: Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36 (2020) 4, S.339-364 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
ZusatzinformationORCID (Huang, Yu)
ORCID (Jun Zhang, Lawrence)
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1057-3569
DOI10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223
SchlagwörterPersuasive Discourse; Writing Improvement; Instructional Effectiveness; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Foreign Countries; Process Approach (Writing); College English; Undergraduate Students; Required Courses; Essays; China
AbstractMany researchers have acknowledged the advantages of process-genre approaches to teaching writing in various genres in a foreign/second language (L2). However, empirical studies examining L2 learners' performance within such a framework are still underrepresented. To fill the research gap, we investigated the effects of a process-genre approach to teaching argumentative writing on L2 learners' writing improvement. Quasi-experimental in design, this intervention was conducted in two English classes at a university in China, with an intervention group receiving L2 writing instruction through the process-genre approach and the comparison group through a commonly practiced conventional approach. Pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest measures were taken for gauging L2 learners' writing performance through an argumentative essay writing task. All the essays were evaluated against a marking rubric in content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Results show significant increases in the intervention group's performance in the immediate posttest and good effects retained in the delayed posttest 6 weeks later. Little improvement in the comparison group was found in the immediate posttest or the delayed posttest. Between-group comparisons indicate that the treatment group outperformed the comparison group in the immediate post- and the delayed posttests, as shown in their overall score and scores on the four components, particularly in content and organization. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenRoutledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2024/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Reading & Writing Quarterly" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: