A Short-Term Intervention Improved Children's Insights into Causal Processes

Autor/inn/en	Dündar-Coecke, Selma; Tolmie, Andrew
Titel	A Short-Term Intervention Improved Children's Insights into Causal Processes
Quelle	In: Psychology of Education Review, 43 (2019) 2, S.20-28 (9 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1463-9807
Schlagwörter	Intervention; Elementary School Students; Elementary School Science; Foreign Countries; Scientific Concepts; Class Activities; Science Process Skills; Science Instruction; Instructional Effectiveness; Low Income Students; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Unterrichtserfolg
Abstract	Understanding of causal mechanisms has largely been ignored in past work on science learning, with studies typically assessing multiple aspects of children's knowledge or focusing on their explanations without differentiating between accounts of factors, variables and mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests that grasp of mechanisms is in fact a crucial predictor of children's science achievement; and that spatial-temporal ability is a key driver of this grasp, helping children to envisage the transformations involved in the continuous causal processes they encounter in science lessons. The present research tested the impact of a short-term intervention designed to promote spatial-temporal thinking with regard to one such process, sinking. Children across Years one to three from a school in a disadvantaged area (5 to 8 year-olds, six classes, N=171) were taken through a three-stage classroom exercise: Making initial predictions and observations; engaging in an imaginative game to explore the interactions between objects and water; and then testing further predictions supported by the introduction of scientific terminology. These stages modelled on a scientific investigation, targeting five key steps: (1) perception; (2) representation; (3) analysis; (4) mental imagery; and (5) use of feedback. The exercise produced substantial improvements in children's performance, regardless of age; better observation and more accurate prediction; more coordinated representations; greater incidence of imagery and mechanism-related analysis; better sensitivity to feedback and increased use of scientific terminology. The data suggest that the ability to utilise spatial-temporal elements in causal inference is highly malleable and that giving children space to think and talk imaginatively about mechanisms is central to their progress. At present, science lessons typically focus on the 'what' rather than the 'why', and do not actively support such thinking about causal processes. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	British Psychological Society. St Andrews House, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester, LE1 7DR, UK. Tel: +44-116-254-9568; e-mail: info@bps.org.uk; Web site: http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/journals/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01