The Cognitive Dissonance between the Rule of Law and Rural Realities: Reading Gillian Hadfield's "Rules for a Flat World" in the Context of Rural Identity and Politics

Autor/in	Conway, Danielle M.
Titel	The Cognitive Dissonance between the Rule of Law and Rural Realities: Reading Gillian Hadfield's "Rules for a Flat World" in the Context of Rural Identity and Politics
Quelle	In: Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership, 5 (2019) 1, S.4-6 (3 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2379-9307
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Psychological Patterns; Laws; Books; Authors; Rural Population; Identification (Psychology); Disadvantaged; Democracy; Civil Rights; Social Integration; Rural Urban Differences; Inclusion; Innovation; Social Justice; Context Effect; Politics; Deans + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Law; Recht; Book; Buch; Monographie; Monografie; Author; Autor; Autorin; Landbevölkerung; Demokratie; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; Soziale Integration; Stadt-Land-Beziehung; Inklusion; Soziale Gerechtigkeit; Politik; Dean; Dekan
Abstract	Rural communities -- as well as other marginalized communities -- see their access to legal infrastructure declining, so much so that they feel disconnected from the rule of law. Current complex law and legal infrastructure focus on big "I" innovation, which is hyper-transactional and benefits the few. Rural communities, and others, would find law and legal infrastructure more relevant if they focused more on small "i" innovation, which centers on negotiating real, societal relationships. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership. 2500 California Plaz, Omaha, NE 68178. e-mail: CJIL@creighton.edu; Web site: http://www.creighton.edu/cjil
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01