Quality of Educational Resources: A Comparative Evaluation of Schools That Joined PISA 2015 from Turkey and Singapore

Autor/inn/en	Özkan, Metin; Balci, Suphi; Kayan, Selman; Is, Engin
Titel	Quality of Educational Resources: A Comparative Evaluation of Schools That Joined PISA 2015 from Turkey and Singapore
Quelle	In: International Education Studies, 11 (2018) 4, S.132-143 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1913-9020
Schlagwörter	Educational Resources; Educational Quality; Comparative Analysis; Comparative Education; Regression (Statistics); Classification; Instructional Materials; Questionnaires; Principals; Statistical Analysis; Secondary Education; Educational Facilities; Foreign Countries; Secondary School Students; International Assessment; Achievement Tests; Turkey; Singapore; Program for International Student Assessment + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bildungsmittel; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Regression; Regressionsanalyse; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Fragebogen; Principal; Schulleiter; Statistische Analyse; Sekundarbereich; Bildungsstätte; Ausland; Sekundarschüler; Achievement test; Achievement; Testing; Test; Tests; Leistungsbeurteilung; Leistungsüberprüfung; Leistung; Testdurchführung; Testen; Türkei; Singapur
Abstract	The objective of the study was to make a comparison among the two countries according to the level of sufficiency of educational resources and to determine the accuracy level at which variables related to educational resources can classify the schools on the basis of countries. Relational survey model was used. The sample group of the study was comprised of 186 schools from Turkey and 174 schools from Singapore for a total of 360 schools. Descriptive analyses and chi-square statistics were used to put forth whether there are differences with regard to the items. Logistic regression analysis was used to make an accurate classification of the schools according to their countries. Statistically significant differences between Turkish and Singapore schools were attained as a result of the chi-square analyses in all variables including lack of educational material, inadequate or poor quality educational material, lack of physical infrastructure and inadequate or poor quality physical infrastructure variables. A total of four variables included in the study explain about 60 % of the variance of Turkish and Singapore schools in having adequate educational resources. The equation obtained from analysis shows that lack of educational material is more important than lack of physical infrastructure. This alone puts forth that school success is related more to the quality of educational material than to physical inadequacies. As a result of the logistic regression with these variables, it was determined that the equation classifies 82% of the total number of 360 schools accurately. As a general conclusion of the study, it was observed with regard to its contributions to the model acquired via logistic regression. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1120 Finch Avenue West Suite 701-309, Toronto, ON M3J 3H7, Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606 Ext 206; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: ies@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/es
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01