Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Lorusso, Jenna R.; Richards, K. Andrew R. |
---|---|
Titel | Expert Perspectives on the Future of Physical Education in Higher Education |
Quelle | In: Quest, 70 (2018) 1, S.114-136 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Lorusso, Jenna R.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0033-6297 |
DOI | 10.1080/00336297.2017.1359789 |
Schlagwörter | Physical Education; Higher Education; Interviews; Delphi Technique; Males; Teacher Education Programs; Physical Education Teachers; Educational Policy; Cooperation; Conflict; Doctoral Programs; Curriculum; Neoliberalism; Educational History; Participatory Research; Semi Structured Interviews; Barriers Körpererziehung; Sportunterricht; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Delphi-Methode; Male; Männliches Geschlecht; Physical education; Physical training; Teacher; Teachers; Sportlehrer; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Co-operation; Kooperation; Konflikt; Doktorandenprogramm; Curricula; Lehrplan; Rahmenplan; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Forschungstätigkeit |
Abstract | Despite physical education teacher education/physical education sport pedagogy's (PETE/PESP's) significant strides in the past century, there are concerns about its future. Grounded in participatory research, and through an interview-Delphi method, this study purposefully sampled five male PETE/PESP scholars' expert critiques of current threats, projections of probable and preferable futures, and recommendations for transformation. Data were analyzed through an interpretive approach. Findings included: (a) limitations in physical education policy, teacher preparation, and status as key threats; (b) more of the same conflicts in the probable future and increased cooperation regarding conflicts in the preferable future; and (c) proactively revising the subdisciplinary framework and doctoral studies as transformative recommendations. We interpret issues critiqued as threatening PETE/PESP's future, and projections of the probable future, as reflective of neoliberal rationality that has renormalized academic work in de-democratizing ways. We interpret that projections of preferable futures and transformative recommendations call for a re-emphasis on ethical academic attitudes to resist neoliberalization and reclaim democracy. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |