Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Lem, Stephanie; Baert, Kathy; Ceulemans, Eva; Onghena, Patrick; Verschaffel, Lieven; Van Dooren, Wim |
---|---|
Titel | Refutational Text and Multiple External Representations as a Method to Remediate the Misinterpretation of Box Plots |
Quelle | In: Educational Psychology, 37 (2017) 10, S.1281-1300 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0144-3410 |
DOI | 10.1080/01443410.2017.1333574 |
Schlagwörter | Graphs; Teaching Methods; Misconceptions; Statistical Data; Statistical Distributions; Concept Formation; Undergraduate Students; Statistics; Pretests Posttests; Intervention; Accuracy; Foreign Countries; Statistical Analysis; Belgium |
Abstract | The ability to interpret graphs is highly important in modern society, but has proven to be a challenge for many people. In this paper, two teaching methods were used to remediate one specific misinterpretation: the area misinterpretation of box plots. First, we used refutational text to explicitly state and invalidate the area misinterpretation of box plots. Second, we used multiple external representations (MERs): Histograms were used as an overlay on box plots in order to give students a better insight in the way box plots represent data distributions. Third, we combined refutational text and MERs. We found that refutational text was successful in improving students' interpretation of box plots, but that the use of MERs did not improve students' interpretation of box plots. The addition of MERs also did not increase the effect of refutational text. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |