Cross-National Data on Victims of Bullying: What Is Really Being Measured?

Autor/inn/en	Smith, Peter K.; Robinson, Susanne; Marchi, Barbara
Titel	Cross-National Data on Victims of Bullying: What Is Really Being Measured?
Quelle	In: International Journal of Developmental Science, 10 (2016) 1-2, S.9-19 (11 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2192-001X
DOI	10.3233/DEV-150174
Schlagwörter	Victims; Bullying; Achievement Tests; Elementary Secondary Education; International Assessment; Foreign Countries; Mathematics Tests; Mathematics Achievement; Science Achievement; Science Tests; Correlation; Grade 4; Grade 8; Online Surveys; National Surveys; Data Analysis; Validity; Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Victim; Opfer; Mobbing; Achievement test; Achievement; Testing; Test; Tests; Leistungsbeurteilung; Leistungsüberprüfung; Leistung; Testdurchführung; Testen; Ausland; Mathmatics sikills; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematical ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Korrelation; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; School year 08; 8. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 08; Auswertung; Gültigkeit
Abstract	There are four sources of large-scale self-report survey data on victim rates, cross-nationally. These are EU Kids Online, Global School Health Survey, Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, and Health Behaviour of School-aged Children. There are some differences in methodology between these surveys, but all use pupil self-report data. They have all been used to look at cross-national differences, in relation to other country characteristics and correlates. Here, we examine measures of internal validity (consistency within a survey) and external validity (agreement across surveys) on these data sets. We first report on internal validity issues, using available means within each survey (correlations across strict or lenient frequency criteria; across types of bullying; across ages; across genders). Generally, these correlations are high. We secondly report on external validity, in the sense of how much agreement there is between the four surveys, where they overlap in countries. Here, we find agreement to be from moderate to zero. These low external validity rates raise concerns about using these cross-national data sets to make judgements about which countries are higher or lower in victim rates. A range of possible explanations for the findings are discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	IOS Press. Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, Amsterdam, 1013 BG, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-20-688-3355; Fax: +31-20-687-0039; e-mail: info@iospress.nl; Web site: http://www.iospress.nl
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01