Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Heideman, Paul D.; Flores, K. Adryan; Sevier, Lu M.; Trouton, Kelsey E. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Effectiveness and Adoption of a Drawing-to-Learn Study Tool for Recall and Problem Solving: Minute Sketches with Folded Lists |
| Quelle | In: CBE - Life Sciences Education, 16 (2017) 2, Artikel 28 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1931-7913 |
| DOI | 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0116 |
| Schlagwörter | Problem Solving; Recall (Psychology); Adoption (Ideas); Biology; Freehand Drawing; Intervention; Introductory Courses; College Students; Task Analysis; Teaching Methods; Instructional Effectiveness; Feedback (Response); Pretests Posttests; Drafting; Mnemonics; Quasiexperimental Design; Surveys; Statistical Analysis; Virginia |
| Abstract | Drawing by learners can be an effective way to develop memory and generate visual models for higher-order skills in biology, but students are often reluctant to adopt drawing as a study method. We designed a nonclassroom intervention that instructed introductory biology college students in a drawing method, minute sketches in folded lists (MSFL), and allowed them to self-assess their recall and problem solving, first in a simple recall task involving non-European alphabets and later using unfamiliar biology content. In two preliminary ex situ experiments, students had greater recall on the simple learning task, non-European alphabets with associated phonetic sounds, using MSFL in comparison with a preferred method, visual review (VR). In the intervention, students studying using MSFL and VR had ~50-80% greater recall of content studied with MSFL and, in a subset of trials, better performance on problem-solving tasks on biology content. Eight months after beginning the intervention, participants had shifted self-reported use of drawing from 2% to 20% of study time. For a small subset of participants, MSFL had become a preferred study method, and 70% of participants reported continued use of MSFL. This brief, low-cost intervention resulted in enduring changes in study behavior. (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | American Society for Cell Biology. 8120 Woodmont Avenue Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20814-2762. Tel: 301-347-9300; Fax: 301-347-9310; e-mail: ascbinfo@ascb.org; Website: http://www.ascb.org |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2020/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
