Greening the Campus: A Theoretical Extension of the Dialogic Communication Approach

Autor/inn/en	Carpenter, Serena; Takahashi, Bruno; Lertpratchya, Alisa P.; Cunningham, Carie
Titel	Greening the Campus: A Theoretical Extension of the Dialogic Communication Approach
Quelle	In: International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17 (2016) 4, S.520-539 (20 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1467-6370
DOI	10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0036
Schlagwörter	Communication Strategies; Qualitative Research; Semi Structured Interviews; Stakeholders; Participation; Empowerment; Sustainability; College Role; Higher Education; College Students; School Personnel; Dialogs (Language); Leadership Responsibility; Administrator Attitudes; Coding; Empathy; Persistence; Risk; Student Role; Cooperation + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Kommunikationsstrategie; Qualitative Forschung; Teilnahme; Nachhaltigkeit; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Collegestudent; Schulpersonal; Dialog; Dialogs; Dialogue; Dialogues; Codierung; Programmierung; Empathie; Ausdauer; Risiko; Co-operation; Kooperation
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the strategic organization-public dialogic communication practices of universities in the USA. The authors used the dialogic model of communication to explore the extent to which higher education sustainability leaders (SL) at the top 25 USA sustainable engage in relational communication strategies. Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with campus sustainability and student group leaders from a mix of regional areas in the USA. The authors examined the transcripts for concepts argued to exist within the dialogic model of communication from the public relations field. Findings: Results reveal that SL rely on dialogic communication strategies to recruit active participants, build stakeholder bridges across campus and empower individuals to have an impact within specific sustainability areas. Communicators most likely engaged in empathy, followed by propinquity, mutuality, commitment and risk of the dialogic model. Research limitations/implications: The authors extended the dialogic model of communication by identifying theoretical issues and scale items that can be used to measure each dimension of the model in future work. Practical implications: The results reveal several ways that institutes of higher education could successfully use relational strategies to promote sustainability across multiple campus groups and departments by recruiting campus ambassadors, collectively defining sustainability and sharing public progress reports. Originality/value: Few studies of sustainability in higher education holistically examine the relationship building practices of organizations that promote sustainability, despite the fact that communication is identified as a key factor in the successful implementation of sustainable actions. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01