Regulators' Views of Quality in Early Childhood Care and Education Settings in Ireland

Autor/in	Hanafin, Sinéad
Titel	Regulators' Views of Quality in Early Childhood Care and Education Settings in Ireland
Quelle	In: Child Care in Practice, 22 (2016) 2, S.183-196 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1357-5279
DOI	10.1080/13575279.2015.1064359
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Early Childhood Education; Educational Quality; Inspection; Preschool Education; Compliance (Legal); Reports; Content Analysis; Federal Regulation; Evaluators; Statistical Analysis; School Administration; Safety; Recordkeeping; Qualitative Research; Ireland + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Early childhood; Education; Frühkindliche Bildung; Frühpädagogik; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Prüfverfahren; Pre-school education; Vorschulerziehung; Abschlussbericht; Berichten; Inhaltsanalyse; Bundeskompetenz; Statistische Analyse; Sicherheit; Leistungsnachweis; Qualitative Forschung; Irland
Abstract	There is a substantial literature on the importance of good-quality early childhood care and education services. There is also, however, some agreement that service quality is a nebulous concept which is difficult to define and therefore difficult to assess. While there is growing literature in the area, the views of one stakeholder group--that of regulators--is relatively scarce in the academic literature. This article presents the views of this stakeholder group using the findings from a systematic analysis of reports of pre-school inspections carried out in the Republic of Ireland. A total of 3007 individual inspection reports comprising 81,189 regulation references were analysed in this study. The findings indicate that regulators are of the view that the majority of services are compliant across most of the 27 regulations inspected, with three-quarters (73%) of all services inspected reported to be non-compliant on five or fewer regulations. The three areas reported to have the highest levels of non-compliance were "management and staffing" (46.2%), "safety" (43%) and "records" (35%). Variation in the findings was identified according to the type of inspection (follow-up inspections had the highest levels of non-compliance), type of service (drop-in services had the highest levels of non-compliance), geography (Dublin North East had the highest level of non-compliance) and extent of the commentary (children's health, welfare and development generated extensive commentary, far in excess of other regulation areas). While international comparisons are not possible due to different approaches and foci for assessment, variation has also been a feature of studies conducted in other jurisdictions including Scotland and the United States. The findings from this study provide an understanding of the views of regulators across the breadth of regulations that legally underpin the service and can act as a benchmark for a variety of stakeholders. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01