A Randomized Trial of Wraparound Facilitation versus Usual Child Protection Services

Autor/inn/en	Browne, Dillon T.; Puente-Duran, Sofia; Shlonsky, Aron; Thabane, Lehana; Verticchio, Dominic
Titel	A Randomized Trial of Wraparound Facilitation versus Usual Child Protection Services
Quelle	In: Research on Social Work Practice, 26 (2016) 2, S.168-179 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1049-7315
DOI	10.1177/1049731514549630
Schlagwörter	Randomized Controlled Trials; Intervention; Facilitators (Individuals); Child Safety; Child Welfare; Outcomes of Treatment; Fidelity; Family Programs; Parent Child Relationship; Child Abuse; Child Neglect; Social Services; Psychological Testing; Affective Measures; Family Income; Functional Behavioral Assessment; Control Groups; Experimental Groups; Foreign Countries; Family Characteristics; Questionnaires; Resources; Canada; Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Kindeswohl; Family program; Familienprogramm; Parents-child relationship; Parent-child-relation; Parent-child relationship; Eltern-Kind-Beziehung; Abuse of children; Abuse; Child; Children; Kindesmissbrauch; Missbrauch; Kind; Kinder; Kindesvernachlässigung; Social service; Soziale Dienstleistung; Soziale Dienste; Psychological test; psychological tests; Psychological examination; Psychologischer Test; Familieneinkommen; Ausland; Fragebogen; Betriebsmittel; Hilfsmittel; Kanada
Abstract	Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of a wraparound facilitator to regular child protection services improved child and family functioning over 20 months. Method: A single blind randomized controlled trial with concealment and stratification across three sites (N = 135 eligible families with substantiated maltreatment). Results: Based on 2 × 2 mixed analysis of variance and intention to treat, both groups improved in child impairments, d = -0.60 [-0.81, -0.39], caregiver psychological distress, d = -0.33 [-0.52, -0.13], and family resources, d = 0.44 [0.27, 0.62]. No measurable benefit was associated with the intervention (e.g., child impairments, d = 0.14 [-0.12, 0.52]). However, treatment fidelity analysis revealed that many components of wraparound were either missing or present in both groups. Conclusions: The presence of a facilitator alone did not appear to improve child or family functioning if the various components of wraparound were not adequately implemented. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01