Evaluation of Educator & Student Use of & Attitudes toward Dissection & Dissection Alternatives

Autor/inn/en	Osenkowski, Pamela; Green, Che; Tjaden, Anne; Cunniff, Peggy
Titel	Evaluation of Educator & Student Use of & Attitudes toward Dissection & Dissection Alternatives
Quelle	In: American Biology Teacher, 77 (2015) 5, S.340-346 (7 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0002-7685
DOI	10.1525/abt.2015.77.5.4
Schlagwörter	Laboratory Procedures; Teacher Attitudes; Student Attitudes; Animals; Biology; Middle School Students; Middle School Teachers; Use Studies; Scientific Methodology; Science Experiments; Teaching Methods; Educational Practices; Educational Strategies; National Surveys; High School Students; Secondary School Teachers; Secondary School Students + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Laboruntersuchung; Lehrerverhalten; Schülerverhalten; Animal; Tier; Tiere; Biologie; Middle school; Middle schools; Student; Students; Mittelschule; Mittelstufenschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Teacher; Teachers; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Benutzerschulung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Bildungspraxis; Lehrstrategie; High school; High schools; Oberschule; Studentin; Sekundarschüler
Abstract	Animal dissection has been routinely practiced in American biology classrooms for decades. With technological advancements, more states adopting student choice measures, and increased awareness about ethical concerns surrounding dissection, many useful dissection alternatives have been developed. To understand the current use of animal dissection and alternatives, and attitudes toward the practices, a nationwide survey of middle and high school biology teachers (n = 1178) and students (n = 500) was conducted. Most teachers (84%) and students (76%) reported using dissection in their classrooms, although nearly half of educators indicated that dissection is decreasing at their school. Educators cited student performance as the main factor driving their decision to use dissection or alternatives and reported conducting dissection exercises because of student interest. Most teachers had an interest in using alternatives, although only 36% used them in place of dissection. More than a third of biology students preferred the use of alternatives over animal specimens, yet most did not request dissection alternatives. Enabling students to opt in to dissection exercises rather than opt out, as is the current practice, and educating teachers and students about student choice and the advantages of dissection alternatives are suggested strategies to reduce animal use in education, in line with the "3 R's" principle. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	University of California Press. 2000 Center Street Suite 303, Berkeley, CA 94704. Tel: 510-643-7154; Fax: 510-642-9917; e-mail: customerservice@ucpressjournals.com; Web site: http://www.ucpressjournals.com/journal.php?j=abt
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01