Is the Tenure Process Fair? What Faculty Think

Autor/inn/en	Lawrence, Janet H.; Celis, Sergio; Ott, Molly
Titel	Is the Tenure Process Fair? What Faculty Think
Quelle	In: Journal of Higher Education, 85 (2014) 2, S.155-192 (38 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-1546
DOI	10.1353/jhe.2014.0010
Schlagwörter	College Faculty; Tenure; Teacher Attitudes; Guidelines; Ethics; Decision Making; Work Experience; Work Environment; Structural Equation Models; Research Universities; Prediction; Feedback (Response) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Fakultät; Amtszeit; Beschäftigungsdauer; Lehrerverhalten; Richtlinien; Ethik; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Employment experience; Job experience; Occupational experience; Berufserfahrung; Arbeitsmilieu; Forschungseinrichtung; Vorhersage
Abstract	A conceptual framework grounded on procedural justice theory was created to explain how judgments about the fairness of tenure decision-making evolved among faculty who had not yet undergone the review. The framework posits that faculty beliefs about fairness are influenced directly by their workplace experiences and both directly and indirectly by their socio-demographic characteristics. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess the proposed direct and indirect effects with data from 2,247 pre-tenure assistant professors at 21 research universities. The results substantiate the importance of perceived campus and department conditions in shaping faculty members' views of tenure reviews and as mediators of faculty members' socio-demographic characteristics. Equitable treatment of junior faculty at the department level and effectiveness of feedback have the strongest relationships with beliefs about the equity of tenure decision-making. Generally speaking, an individual's sense of control during the process of constructing the tenure dossier predicts his or her judgments about the fairness of tenure reviews. Practical suggestions for campus leaders regarding the conditions that inform faculty beliefs about tenure reviews and implications for future research are discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Ohio State University Press. 180 Pressey Hall, 1070 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210-1002. Tel: 614-292-1407; Fax: 614-292-2065; Web site: http://www.ohiostatepress.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10