Predicting End-of-Year Achievement Test Performance: A Comparison of Assessment Methods

Autor/inn/en	Kettler, Ryan J.; Elliott, Stephen N.; Kurz, Alexander; Zigmond, Naomi; Lemons, Christopher J.; Kloo, Amanda; Shrago, Jacqueline; Beddow, Peter A.; Williams, Leila; Bruen, Charles; Lupp, Lynda; Farmer, Jeanie; Mosiman, Melanie
Titel	Predicting End-of-Year Achievement Test Performance: A Comparison of Assessment Methods
Quelle	In: Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39 (2014) 3, S.156-169 (14 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1534-5084
DOI	10.1177/1534508413475644
Schlagwörter	Eligibility; Alternative Assessment; Academic Achievement; Predictive Validity; Screening Tests; Reading Tests; Mathematics Tests; Reliability; Academic Standards; Testing Accommodations; Individualized Education Programs; Educational Policy; Evaluation Methods; Measures (Individuals); Multiple Choice Tests; Computer Assisted Testing; Predictor Variables; Demography; Disabilities; Correlation; Evidence; Arizona; Pennsylvania; South Carolina; Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS); Peabody Individual Achievement Test; Social Skills Rating System; Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Eignung; Schulleistung; Screening-Verfahren; Lesetest; Reliabilität; Testing process; Accessibility (for disabled); Accessibility; Disabled person; Testdurchführung; Testen; Barrierefreiheit; Zugänglichkeit; Behinderter; Individualized education program; Individualisierendes Lernen; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Messdaten; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Prädiktor; Demografie; Handicap; Behinderung; Korrelation; Evidenz
Abstract	Motivated by the multiple-measures clause of recent federal policy regarding student eligibility for alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MASs), this study examined how scores or combinations of scores from a diverse set of assessments predicted students' end-of-year proficiency status on statewide achievement tests. Scores from 388 eighth-grade students, both with and without disabilities, from 3 states were compared for the predictive validity of test inferences from a set of brief online screening tests, teachers' ratings of performance, and students' previous year's achievement tests. The research team developed screening tests in reading and mathematics that were found to be internally consistent and added predictive value to the identification of students who would perform at a level below proficient on state achievement tests of reading and mathematics. Although achievement results from the previous year were more predictive of future achievement results, scores from the online screening tests and from Performance Screening Guides could be used as supplements to typical achievement tests. Implications of these findings for educators in the 17 states currently using AA-MAS tests for students with disabilities are discussed, and needed future research is identified. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10