Acceptability of the Components of a Loneliness Intervention among Elderly Dutch People: A Qualitative Study

Autor/inn/en	Honigh-de Vlaming, R.; Haveman-Nies, A.; Ziylan, C.; Renes, R. J.
Titel	Acceptability of the Components of a Loneliness Intervention among Elderly Dutch People: A Qualitative Study
Quelle	In: American Journal of Health Education, 44 (2013) 3, S.136-145 (10 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1932-5037
DOI	10.1080/19325037.2013.767734
Schlagwörter	Psychological Patterns; Foreign Countries; Aging (Individuals); Older Adults; Intervention; Program Effectiveness; At Risk Persons; Interviews; Interpersonal Communication; Health Education; Mass Media; Pamphlets; Newspapers; Adult Education; Communication Skills; Access to Information; Recreational Activities; Health Promotion; Netherlands + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Aging; Altern; Älterer Erwachsener; Risikogruppe; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Interpersonale Kommunikation; Gesundheitsaufklärung; Gesundheitsbildung; Gesundheitserziehung; Massenmedien; Pamphlet; Newspaper; Zeitung; Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Kommunikationsstil; Freizeitgestaltung; Gesundheitsfürsorge; Gesundheitshilfe; Reihenuntersuchung; Niederlande
Abstract	Background: Healthy Ageing is a complex intervention aimed at reducing the prevalence of loneliness among elderly Dutch people. Purpose: This study aimed to assess how mass media communication materials, information meetings, and psychosocial courses were received by elderly people at high risk of loneliness. Methods: Face-to-face interviews with 17 independently living elderly persons at increased risk of loneliness were conducted. They provided information about factors in?uencing attention to and acceptability of the content of the intervention components. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed with Atlas. Results: The mass media communication materials were not successful in attracting attention because interviewees' expectations about the communication channels differed from what was provided, the perceived personal relevance of the message was low, and the presentation was not attractive. The content of the intervention components was not well received because the objectives and components did not connect with the priority group's perception of their environment. Discussion: This study showed that the classical health education approach with one-way communication did not succeed in reaching the priority group. Translation to Health Education Practice: To select appropriate theoretical methods and practical strategies, such as using storytelling and personal invitation, we recommend involvement of the priority group. (Contains 2 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10