Evaluating Psychiatry Residents as Physician-Managers: Development of an Assessment Tool

Autor/inn/en	Sockalingam, Sanjeev; Stergiopoulos, Vicky; Maggi, Julie D.; Zaretsky, Ari; Stovel, Laura; Hodges, Brian
Titel	Evaluating Psychiatry Residents as Physician-Managers: Development of an Assessment Tool
Quelle	In: Academic Psychiatry, 37 (2013) 1, S.11-17 (7 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1042-9670
DOI	10.1176/appi.ap.12010006
Schlagwörter	Program Effectiveness; Portfolios (Background Materials); Student Attitudes; Graduate Medical Education; Foreign Countries; Psychiatry; Grounded Theory; Methods; Physicians; Management Development; Interviews; Qualitative Research; Surveys; Medical School Faculty; Teacher Attitudes; Statistical Analysis; Administrator Evaluation; Student Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Medical Students; Canada + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Schülerverhalten; Ausland; Psychiatrie; Method; Methode; Physician; Doctor; Arzt; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Qualitative Forschung; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Lehrerverhalten; Statistische Analyse; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Kanada
Abstract	Objectives: With the emergence of physician-manager (PM) curricula in medical education, more effective assessment tools are needed to evaluate psychiatry trainees in this role. The aim of this study was to determine psychiatry residents', program directors', and PM educators' perceptions about PM role-assessment. Methods: Psychiatry residents at two Canadian programs were given a survey on PM assessment and the use of portfolios to assess PM competency. Qualitative interviews of Canadian psychiatry educators and program directors were used to determine faculty perceptions on PM assessment. Authors analyzed survey data with descriptive statistics, and qualitative interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results: Nearly 55% of psychiatry residents responded to the survey; 47% of residents did not want to change the way they were assessed by the PM role. Residents identified an array of assessment methods for each of the specific PM domains. Educator interview themes included supervisor and resident barriers to assessment, the need for new PM assessment approaches integrating multiple assessment methods, and a role for the use of portfolios if sufficient infrastructure was available. Conclusion: The data supported a preference for a multimodal approach to assessment of the PM role. Future research should examine the implementation of the proposed PM assessment tool. (Contains 1 table.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. 1000 Wilson Boulevard Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901. Tel: 800-368-5777; Tel: 703-907-7856; Fax: 703-907-1092; e-mail: appi@psych.org; Web site: http://ap.psychiatryonline.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10