Improving Scholarly Discourse: Responding to Reviewers and Understanding Scholarly Impact

Autor/in	Baumgartner, Lisa M.
Titel	Improving Scholarly Discourse: Responding to Reviewers and Understanding Scholarly Impact
Quelle	(2021), (6 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Faculty Publishing; Responses; Feedback (Response); Journal Articles; Scholarship; Social Media; Best Practices; Editing; Information Dissemination + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Journal article; Zeitschriftenaufsatz; Scholarships; Stipendium; Soziale Medien; Redaktion; Textbearbeitung; Informationsverbreitung
Abstract	Publication expectations continue to rise at academic institutions. Successfully publishing an article means effectively responding to reviewer comments. In this paper, I briefly delineate the publication process. I discuss best practices for responding to reviewer comments and provide examples. I review how the scholarly impact of one's work is measured. Terms such as impact factor, H-index, and [subscript ¡]10 index are defined and critiqued. Altmetric measures the effect of scholarly impact in social media. I describe and critique venues for sharing research such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu. [For the complete volume, "American Association for Adult and Continuing Education Inaugural 2020 Conference Proceedings (Online, October 27-30, 2020)," see ED611534.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Association for Adult and Continuing Education. 10111 Martin Luther King Junior Highway Suite 200C, Bowie, MD 20720. Tel: 301-459-6261; Fax: 301-459-6241; e-mail: office@aaace.org; e-mail: aaace10@aol.com; Web site: http://www.aaace.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01