Identifying Professional Development Needs in Mathematics: A Planning Tool for Grades 3-7. Second Edition

Autor/inn/en	Taylor, Mary Jo; Dimino, Joseph A.; Gellar, Leanne Ketterlin; Koontz, Trish
Institution	Center on Instruction; RMC Research Corporation
Titel	Identifying Professional Development Needs in Mathematics: A Planning Tool for Grades 3-7. Second Edition
Quelle	(2010), (28 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Leitfaden; Unterricht; Lehrer; State Departments of Education; Learning Processes; Faculty Development; Technical Assistance; Planning; Grade 3; Grade 4; Grade 5; Grade 6; Grade 7; Guides; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematical Concepts; Concept Formation; Teaching Methods; Teacher Education; Evaluation Methods; Benchmarking; Needs Assessment; Mathematics Skills + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Lesson concept; Instruction; Unterrichtsentwurf; Unterrichtsprozess; Teacher; Teachers; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Kultusministerium; Learning process; Lernprozess; Technische Hilfe; Ablaufplanung; Planungsprozess; School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; School year 05; 5. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 05; School year 06; 6. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 06; School year 07; 7. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 07; Handbuch; Leitfaden; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Concept learning; Begriffsbildung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Bedarfsermittlung; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematics ability; Mathematische Kompetenz
Abstract	This document offers a planning tool for grades 3-7 that can be used by regional comprehensive centers, other technical assistance centers, and state departments of education to plan professional development for teachers. It is based on the "National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report" which was published in 2008. The panel synthesized its final report after reviewing 16,000 research publications and policy reports and receiving public testimony from more than 100 individuals. In addition, they reviewed written commentary from 160 organizations and individuals and analyzed survey results from 743 active teachers of algebra. The panel worked as a committee of the whole but largely worked in task groups and subcommittees. Each of the five task groups carried out a detailed analysis of the available evidence in these areas: Conceptual Knowledge and Skills, Learning Processes, Instructional Practices, Teachers and Teacher Education, and Assessment. This tool can be useful for educators as they engage in careful planning and consideration of the "benchmarks for the critical foundations" recommended by the panel. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Center on Instruction. Available from: RMC Research Corporation. 1000 Market Street Building 2, Portsmouth, NH 03801. Tel: 800-258-0802; Tel: 603-422-8888; e-mail: COI-Info@rmcres.com; Web site: http://www.centeroninstruction.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10