Dynamic Database for Quality Indicators Comparison in Education. Working Paper N. 04/2010

Autor/inn/en	Poliandri, Donatella; Cardone, Michele; Muzzioli, Paola; Romiti, Sara
Titel	Dynamic Database for Quality Indicators Comparison in Education. Working Paper N. 04/2010
Quelle	(2010), (26 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Databases; Web Sites; Models; Educational Indicators; Educational Quality; Comparative Education; Comparative Analysis; Educational Assessment; Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Methods; School Statistics; Measurement Techniques; Educational Policy; Reports; Archives; Foreign Countries; Australia; New Zealand; United States + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Datenbank; Web-Design; Analogiemodell; Educational indicato; Bildungsindikator; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Messtechnik; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Abschlussbericht; Berichten; Archivwesen; Archiv; Ausland; Australien; Neuseeland; USA
Abstract	The purpose of this study is to explore aspects and indicators most commonly used to assess the quality of education systems in different countries through the comparison of 12 national publications describing the state of the educational system. To compare indicators the CIPP model was chosen. This model is organized in four main parts: Context, Input, Process and Product. Each main part was then divided into categories based on the research literature (e.g., Input is divided into human, financial and material resources). Based on the CIPP model an electronic database for quality indicators comparison has been designed and implemented. This system is dynamic and easy to update. Using the database it is possible to compare countries according to several criteria (e.g., main parts and categories of the CIPP model, ISCED [International Standard Classification of Education] level, level of data collection). The database is available to the public and is designed for researchers and scholastic decision makers. A first comparison shows that processes at the classroom level are rarely considered, whereas public financial resources as well as achievement results are always included. The study concludes with a discussion of the findings of the comparison, as well as suggestions for future research aimed at further defining relevant indicators for the assessment of education quality." An appendix presents: "The on-line database: structure and functions. (Contains 5 figures and 7 footnotes.) [This paper was produced by INVALSI - National Institute for the Educational Evaluation of Instruction and Training.] (As Provided).
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10