San Diego Mesa College Accreditation Survey Report.

Autor/inn/en	Corbin, Lynda; Armstrong, William B.
Institution	San Diego Community Coll. District, CA. Research and Planning.
Titel	San Diego Mesa College Accreditation Survey Report.
Quelle	(1996), (56 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Accreditation (Institutions); College Faculty; Community Colleges; Educational Facilities; Financial Support; Governance; Institutional Evaluation; Institutional Mission; Instructional Effectiveness; Reports; Satisfaction; School Surveys; Self Evaluation (Groups); Standards; Two Year College Students; Two Year Colleges + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Fakultät; Community college; Community College; Bildungsstätte; Finanzielle Förderung; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Unterrichtserfolg; Abschlussbericht; Berichten; Zufriedenheit; Self evaluation; Group; Groups; Selbstevaluation; Gruppe (Soz); Standard
Abstract	In Fall, 1996, the San Diego Community College District undertook a self evaluation survey to prepare for the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) visit in 1998. Faculty, staff, and students at San Diego Mesa College were asked if the College met the ten standards of the ACCJC as evidence of "good educational practices." Five surveys were distributed: (1) Faculty Accreditation Surveys; (2) Adjunct Faculty Accreditation Surveys; (3) Staff Accreditation Surveys; and (4) Accreditation Student Surveys; and (5) Campus Climate Surveys. Data tables list return rates and are arranged by faculty, staff, and student surveys. Survey results are arranged by "standard" for: standard one--institutional mission; standard two--institutional integrity; standard three--institutional effectiveness; standard four--educational programs; standard five--student support and development; standard six--information and learning resources; standard seven--faculty and staff; standard eight--physical resources; standard nine--financial resources; and standard ten--institutional governance. Study findings included the following: (1) 77.1% of the faculty and 75.8% of the staff were familiar with the mission statement; (2) the majority of faculty (82.5%) and staff (84.3%) agreed that Mesa represents itself honestly and accurately; (3) most faculty (94.2%) and students (91.6%) were pleased with the quality of teaching and instruction; (4) faculty were more likely than staff to report that student services had sufficient staff (49.6% compared to 40.0%); (5) the library is open when they need it, according to 91.3% of the faculty and 94.2% of the students; (6) most of the faculty (83.5%) staff (82.4%) and students (79.2%) found the campus adequately maintained; (7) fewer than one in three faculty (29.6%) felt that District resource allocation was appropriate to support Mesa programs and 39.2% of the staff agreed; and (8) 44% of the faculty and 41.0% of the staff thought that the district administration was structured to provide effective management. (YKH)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC