The Past as Prologue: Examining the Consequences of Business as Usual. Center Paper 01-93.

Autor/inn/en	Jones, Dennis P.; und weitere
Institution	National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, CO.; California Higher Education Policy Center, San Jose.
Titel	The Past as Prologue: Examining the Consequences of Business as Usual. Center Paper 01-93.
Quelle	(1993), (28 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Access to Education; Change Strategies; Delivery Systems; Educational Change; Educational Demand; Educational Environment; Educational Equity (Finance); Educational Innovation; Educational Philosophy; Educational Trends; Financial Problems; Financial Support; Futures (of Society); Higher Education; Long Range Planning; Politics of Education; Public Education; Role of Education; School Restructuring; State Aid; State Colleges; State Universities; California + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Lösungsstrategie; Auslieferung; Bildungsreform; Bildungsanforderung; Bildungsnachfrage; Lernumgebung; Pädagogische Umwelt; Schulumwelt; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; Bildungsphilosophie; Erziehungsphilosophie; Bildungsentwicklung; Finanzielle Förderung; Future; Society; Zukunft; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Langfristige Planung; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Öffentliche Erziehung; Bildungsauftrag; Schulreformplan; Schulumwandlung; Staatliche Universität; Kalifornien
Abstract	This study examined the ability of California to meet increased demand for postsecondary education without significantly altering the basic historical assumptions and policies that have governed relations between the state and its institutions of higher learning. Results of a series of analyses that estimated projected enrollments and costs under various scenarios suggested that significant changes would be needed, and the report lists eight options to be considered: (1) eliminate certain forms of output and reduce certain services; (2) restrict access to the system; (3) increase revenue stream (tuition); (4) deliver higher education programs through other types of organizations; (5) change the governance structure; (6) change delivery systems by moving to off-campus instruction, greater use of technology, revising pedagogical approaches, and revising curriculums; (7) eliminate either the senior year in high school or the freshman year in college; and (8) change the relationship between higher education and the state government. The appendix contains information on methodology and the assumptions made to arrive at the findings. (CH)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC