Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Institution | General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. Health, Education, and Human Services Div. |
---|---|
Titel | Adult Education. Measuring Program Results Has Been Challenging. Report to Congressional Requesters. |
Quelle | (1995), (48 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Recht; Accountability; Adult Basic Education; Adult Education; Adult Literacy; Cooperative Programs; Coordination; Educational Legislation; Employment Programs; English (Second Language); Federal Legislation; Federal Programs; Job Training; Literacy Education; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Student Evaluation Verantwortung; Adult; Adults; Education; Adult education; Erwachsenenbildung; Adult basic education; Adult training; Koordination; Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Employment program; Employment programme; Employment programmes; Beschäftigungsprogramm; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Bundesrecht; Berufsqualifizierender Bildungsgang; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung |
Abstract | A study reviewed the Adult Education Act's (AEA's) largest program--the State Grant Program, its coordination with federal employment training programs, and the extent to which the program ensured accountability for program quality and results. The study relied on national data in conducting its review and performed more detailed work in three states--California, Connecticut, and Iowa. Findings indicate that the goals of the AEA are broad and include citizenship and employment as well as the overall improvement of the adult education system. The most common types of instruction funded under the State Grant Program were basic education, secondary education, and English as a Second Language. Because many clients of federal employment training programs needed instruction provided by the State Grant Program, coordination among these programs was essential. Although the State Grant Program funded programs that addressed the educational needs of millions of adults, it had difficulty ensuring accountability for results because of a lack of clearly defined program objectives, questionable validity of adult student assessments, and poor student data. Experts disagreed about whether developing indicators of program quality will help the states. (Appendixes include State Grant Program budget and enrollment data, comments from the Department of Education.) (YLB) |
Anmerkungen | U.S. General Accounting Office, P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg, MD 20884-6015 (first copy free; additional copies $2 each; 100 or more: 25% discount). |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |